Share Wooddale Avenue Bridge Project on FacebookShare Wooddale Avenue Bridge Project on TwitterShare Wooddale Avenue Bridge Project on LinkedinEmail Wooddale Avenue Bridge Project link
The City is considering replacing the existing bridge because the existing limestone (relatively weak building material) masonry railings and corrugated-metal arch are deteriorating. In addition, the height and strength of the railings does not meet current standards and the narrow deck is inadequate to safely accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists.
Construction of a replacement bridge is unknown at this time. Staff is completing the Section 106 review process and must consult with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and other interested parties, such as relevant state agencies, local heritage preservation commissions, and interested individuals, as it goes through the process.
Multi-plate Corrugated Metal Arch
Limestone Masonry Railing and Headwall
Concrete Footing — Cracked in multiple locations, scour occurring under north footing.
Metal Arch — Corroded at concrete footing. Arch could be strengthened but corrosion would continue and bridge’s load-carrying capacity would be limited, as it is now.
Fill — Fill above metal arch must be removed to repair corroding arch and cracked concrete footings. Stone railings/headwalls would be difficult to brace during process.
Limestone Railing & Headwall — Railing doesn’t meet crash standards. Stone is severely deteriorated.
Roadway — Roadway needs to be 10’ wider for pedestrian and bike use. West headwall would have to be taken down stone by stone and rebuilt 10’ to the west. Stone would crumble in process.
The City is considering replacing the existing bridge because the existing limestone (relatively weak building material) masonry railings and corrugated-metal arch are deteriorating. In addition, the height and strength of the railings does not meet current standards and the narrow deck is inadequate to safely accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists.
Construction of a replacement bridge is unknown at this time. Staff is completing the Section 106 review process and must consult with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and other interested parties, such as relevant state agencies, local heritage preservation commissions, and interested individuals, as it goes through the process.
Multi-plate Corrugated Metal Arch
Limestone Masonry Railing and Headwall
Concrete Footing — Cracked in multiple locations, scour occurring under north footing.
Metal Arch — Corroded at concrete footing. Arch could be strengthened but corrosion would continue and bridge’s load-carrying capacity would be limited, as it is now.
Fill — Fill above metal arch must be removed to repair corroding arch and cracked concrete footings. Stone railings/headwalls would be difficult to brace during process.
Limestone Railing & Headwall — Railing doesn’t meet crash standards. Stone is severely deteriorated.
Roadway — Roadway needs to be 10’ wider for pedestrian and bike use. West headwall would have to be taken down stone by stone and rebuilt 10’ to the west. Stone would crumble in process.
You need to be signed in to comment in this Guest Book. Click here to Sign In or Register to get involved
Agreed that a functional bridge is more important than the history of the original construction in a case like this. The WPA was great, and people should learn about it in class or books, and as mentioned in a previous comment, a sign would be nice (actually more educational than the current bridge, which I have walked up to many times and never known about its history.
Jeff Nowak
over 2 years ago
No information on how restoration will be done and what will be gained or lost of its history. Can the bridge be restored keeping its history?
Victoria Joy Wilcox
over 2 years ago
A safe bridge is more important than a historical one. A sign could be put up near the new one telling the old bridges story.
Agreed that a functional bridge is more important than the history of the original construction in a case like this. The WPA was great, and people should learn about it in class or books, and as mentioned in a previous comment, a sign would be nice (actually more educational than the current bridge, which I have walked up to many times and never known about its history.
No information on how restoration will be done and what will be gained or lost of its history. Can the bridge be restored keeping its history?
A safe bridge is more important than a historical one. A sign could be put up near the new one telling the old bridges story.