Share Two More Renderings on Facebook
Share Two More Renderings on Linkedin
Email Two More Renderings link
Two more renderings have been created and attached in the document area. They are views north of 64th Street without the noise wall. Thanks
Two more renderings have been created and attached in the document area. They are views north of 64th Street without the noise wall. Thanks
Share Graphical Renderings on Facebook
Share Graphical Renderings on Linkedin
Email Graphical Renderings link
The project team has created 13 graphical renderings of various options from various angles. All the renderings will be posted in the document section of the website. Staff is seeking feedback on the matrix, concepts and renderings until March 8. Staff will make a recommendation to the city council on March 19. A staff report with a recommendation will be posted here during the week of March 11. Thanks, Chad Millner, City Engineer.
The project team has created 13 graphical renderings of various options from various angles. All the renderings will be posted in the document section of the website. Staff is seeking feedback on the matrix, concepts and renderings until March 8. Staff will make a recommendation to the city council on March 19. A staff report with a recommendation will be posted here during the week of March 11. Thanks, Chad Millner, City Engineer.
Share Updated Design Concepts and Impact Matrix – Feedback Requested on Facebook
Share Updated Design Concepts and Impact Matrix – Feedback Requested on Linkedin
Email Updated Design Concepts and Impact Matrix – Feedback Requested link
Updated Matrix and Concepts can be found in the documents section. Improved graphics are in the works and will be posted in a week or so. We are opening the public comment tool again until March 8. Please submit comments before then. Our tentative schedule is to seek council direction at the March 19 City Council Meeting.
Updated Matrix and Concepts can be found in the documents section. Improved graphics are in the works and will be posted in a week or so. We are opening the public comment tool again until March 8. Please submit comments before then. Our tentative schedule is to seek council direction at the March 19 City Council Meeting.
Share Alternative Analysis Update Feb. 8 2024 on Facebook
Share Alternative Analysis Update Feb. 8 2024 on Linkedin
Email Alternative Analysis Update Feb. 8 2024 link
Staff appreciates all the participation by residents thus far. We are working on updating the concept matrix, reviewing constructability of each concept, and creating images to better understand what they might look like. The options that are being reviewed in greater detail are Option 1A Switchbacks East, Option 5B moving the bridge 500-ft west, a new Option 5D moving the bridge 500-ft east and landing near the aquatic center parking lot, and Option 6A elevators. After we have more details and imagery, we will seek comments on this page. Thanks
Staff appreciates all the participation by residents thus far. We are working on updating the concept matrix, reviewing constructability of each concept, and creating images to better understand what they might look like. The options that are being reviewed in greater detail are Option 1A Switchbacks East, Option 5B moving the bridge 500-ft west, a new Option 5D moving the bridge 500-ft east and landing near the aquatic center parking lot, and Option 6A elevators. After we have more details and imagery, we will seek comments on this page. Thanks
Share Dec. 19, 2023 City Council Meeting on Facebook
Share Dec. 19, 2023 City Council Meeting on Linkedin
Email Dec. 19, 2023 City Council Meeting link
Thanks to those that attended the neighborhood meeting on Dec. 14. We had approximately 20 community members attend. Staff presented a project overview of all the potential options and fielded great questions. Staff has decided to give council a project update and not request approval of a specific option at the Dec. 19 Council Meeting. The discussion identified options 1A and 5B for additional review. Appreciate the dialogue.
Thanks to those that attended the neighborhood meeting on Dec. 14. We had approximately 20 community members attend. Staff presented a project overview of all the potential options and fielded great questions. Staff has decided to give council a project update and not request approval of a specific option at the Dec. 19 Council Meeting. The discussion identified options 1A and 5B for additional review. Appreciate the dialogue.
Share Design Concepts and Impact Matrix – Feedback Requested on Facebook
Share Design Concepts and Impact Matrix – Feedback Requested on Linkedin
Email Design Concepts and Impact Matrix – Feedback Requested link
At the November 21st City Council meeting, staff was asked to provide design concepts to residents for feedback on the Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge. The Council Item can be reviewed here: Rosland Park Council Item. The City has developed 12 possible concepts including doing nothing. Concept level drawings of the 11 concepts and the matrix are posted here. 14 review criteria were identified during discussions with residents, staff, and consultants. A matrix was built with these 14 criteria and 12 concepts. The matrix reviewed each criterion on each concept. According to the analysis, Option 1A balances the impacts of the 14 criteria the best. Your feedback is welcome to better understand how this type of infrastructure project could improve the quality of life for people that live and work in Edina. Please share your comments by Monday, Dec. 11, 2023.
At the November 21st City Council meeting, staff was asked to provide design concepts to residents for feedback on the Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge. The Council Item can be reviewed here: Rosland Park Council Item. The City has developed 12 possible concepts including doing nothing. Concept level drawings of the 11 concepts and the matrix are posted here. 14 review criteria were identified during discussions with residents, staff, and consultants. A matrix was built with these 14 criteria and 12 concepts. The matrix reviewed each criterion on each concept. According to the analysis, Option 1A balances the impacts of the 14 criteria the best. Your feedback is welcome to better understand how this type of infrastructure project could improve the quality of life for people that live and work in Edina. Please share your comments by Monday, Dec. 11, 2023.
Share MnDOT Westbound Highway 62 Third Lane and Noise Wall on Facebook
Share MnDOT Westbound Highway 62 Third Lane and Noise Wall on Linkedin
Email MnDOT Westbound Highway 62 Third Lane and Noise Wall link
In August, MnDOT informed the City that they would like to make the westbound third lane from Valley View Road to Highway 100 along Highway 62 permanent. This would require constructing an additional travel lane and shoulder to highway standards. This work would require the construction of a 20-ft tall noise wall. MnDOT is currently developing preliminary layouts. The project does not have funding yet. If funding is identified, construction is anticipated for 2027 – 2028.
In August, MnDOT informed the City that they would like to make the westbound third lane from Valley View Road to Highway 100 along Highway 62 permanent. This would require constructing an additional travel lane and shoulder to highway standards. This work would require the construction of a 20-ft tall noise wall. MnDOT is currently developing preliminary layouts. The project does not have funding yet. If funding is identified, construction is anticipated for 2027 – 2028.
